Inna came back home from work and found out that in the yard it isn't met, strangely enough, by Chyoko's favourite dog. Inna called and looked for the favourite of a family, but didn't find. To the yard the neighbour's boy ran and told that saw how the neigbour Galina dragged Chyoko to herself to the yard. Fervent Inninythe doggie was known by all area, therefore the alarmed boy also came running to tell about the seen.
Among inhabitants of the neighboring area all knew that Galina's family -unsuccessful. Hearings went the different. From four children the senior, allegedly, is in imprisonment places, and the most younger, 2 - the monthly kid, is in awful conditions and without appropriate supervision.
Parents as it is necessary earn - that in cabbage on spontaneous to a rynochka trade, forcemeat … Moreover, neighbors say that Galina with the husband more than once enticed dogs from a city dump to itself into the yard, and then … dogs disappeared.
Inna with the husband went to the neigbour. When the speech about the gone Chyoko, Galina and her husband of steelcameto tell different stories.Allegedly, they didn't know that a well-groomed dog with a collar - neighbour's. Also sent it to the village to the grandmother … Or to protect a melon field to the grandfather … Generally, they where sent a doggie …don't remember
Inna, having suspected wrong, I addressed in militia. In conversation withdistrict police officerGalina admitted thatI ached it 4 - the summer son, I started coughing. And, to cure the chilled child, careless mother decided to feed him sobachatiny.Having caught Chyoko, Galina carried out a sentence.Dog killed, skinned and ate.
And there are witnesses who claim that собачатину used on picnic in the company with friends, having made of it a shish kebab and under vodka.
The militia found the remains of a corpse of an animal in a well of the house of the suspect. But in initiation of legal proceedingsacting chief of Ship regional department V. CobaI refused, because "in actions of the citizen To.the structure of a crime provided by Art. 299 of UK of Ukraine (animals abuse)is absentrecognizing that is absentmockery at animals, made with applicationcruelmethods, or from hooligan motives. The conflict situation lastedquickly(! - a bus),I occurred because of spontaneously arisen …". On it the explanation in the resolution comes to an end. Because of what such spontaneous(!)there was a conflict situation - and murder of an animal is concrete, his cutting, preparation of its meat and the use in food remains to unknown …
The district police officer led with Galina preventive discussion about inadmissibility of commission of offenses and need to support good-neighbourhood.
HostessCheck, having lost awful image of the favourite of a family, I started being afraid of such unsuccessful neighbors. Inna addressed inNikolaev city society of protection of the rights of animals.Together with them statementswere madeto the prosecutor of Nikolaev and prosecutor of the Ship area. And yesterday, on April 28, fighters for justice sent the letterto the chief of Regional Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine in the Nikolaev area, to the militia colonel Vladimir Uvarov.
What leaves, what the legislation on protection of animals on paper is, and practically nobody adheres to it?
After all for someone a dog or a cat - the pet, the family member who faithfully loves you, protects, understands your mood without words, the first joyfully meets from work, in the evening soothingly snuffles near your bed, and the main thing - never will betray. The favourite who doesn't know lie, avidity and meanness. And therefore it is trustful and defenseless. And for someone is simply walking shish kebab … And anything more … And you could live near the person, at which such vital principles? Or, having such neighbors, to let to take a walk in the yard of the small child?