The Russian won court against the chairman of SBU

Online: {{ reading || 0 }}Read:{{ views || 693 }}Comments:{{ comments || 0 }}    Rating:(415)         

The Shevchenkovsky district court of Kiev satisfied the statement of claim of the People's Deputy Gennady MOSKAL to the chairman of Security service of Ukraine to VALENTYN NALYVAICHENKO and SBU about a denial of the data discrediting honor, advantage and business reputation.

As reported the UNIAN in a press - service of the Civil movement "National Self-defense", the court made the relevant decision on October 23.

The court recognized doubtful and discrediting honor, advantage and business reputation information concerning. The Russian, stated on a press - conferences in SBU on November 6, 2008 the chairman of Security service of Ukraine V. NALIVAYCHENKO. The court obliged Security service of Ukraine to place within 10 days from the date of the introduction the judgment in validity on the Internet - a SBU site the text of a denial of V. NALIVAYCHENKO told then.

At the same time, as the court refused collecting in favor of. The Russian from Security service of Ukraine of 100 thousand UAH for drawing to him moral harm, the People's Deputy of Ukraine appealed against this decision in Appellate court of Kiev, reported in "National self-defense".

Also in "NANOSECOND" reminded that 4 more civil cases are under consideration in Shevchenkovsky district court of Kiev in the claim of. The Russian to SBU, V. NALIVAYCHENKO and the former vice-chairman of SBU Tibery DURDINTSU about a denial of the data discrediting honor, advantage and business reputation, and compensation of moral harm.

As it was reported, on November 6 V. NALIVAYCHENKO declared that the SBU transferred to the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine materials for initiation of legal proceedings concerning the People's Deputy G. Russian.

"By results of pre-investigation check of SBU corruption activity of the People's Deputy of Ukraine is documented. The Russian, connected, first of all, with violation of the law about the status of veterans of war", - V. NALIVAYCHENKO told. It explained that it is a question of illegal providing documents "to officials or simply bribe takers" which had no relation to operations, and therefore had no right to be considered as veterans.

-


Комментариев: {{total}}


englishcriminality