In "Gazprom" don't see the reasons for interrogations their top - managers in Ukraine

Online: {{ reading || 0 }}Read:{{ views || 810 }}Comments:{{ comments || 0 }}    Rating:(486)         

The procedural bases for a call of the head of Gazprom Alexey Miller and his deputy Valery Golubev for evidence in SBU aren't present.

I told the high-ranking source of the Kommersant-Ukraina newspaper in "Gazprom" about it, making comments on the statement of the lawyer ex-the deputy head of State customs of Ukraine Anatoly Makarenko - Yury Sukhy.

It is known that the lawyer asks Security service of Ukraine to cause as witnesses a top - managers of "Gazprom" - Miller and Golubev - and to interrogate them about circumstances and conditions of drawing up contracts concerning Rosukrenergo gas.

"No procedural bases for Alexey Miller and Valery Golubev's call for witness statement are present", - told the high-ranking source in "Gazprom".

According to the interlocutor of the newspaper, for a consequence doesn't matter who was the initiator of the right of a cedation of a debt.

"We conducted long negotiations with NAK, considered one million schemes and signed lawful contracts. And if the Ukrainian officials illegally obtained customs clearance for this gas, we don't bear for it any responsibility", - he told.

According to the source, Miller as the head of Gazprom still didn't act as the witness in vessels by consideration of economic and criminal cases.

The source in Ministry of Fuel and Energy confirmed that now to call Miller and Golubev "it doesn't make sense". "The SBU and has so enough bases to bring all three to trial and without indications of managers of "Gazprom", - it considers.

To involve managers of "Gazprom" as witnesses, in his opinion, it is expedient in the course of consideration of legality of return of 12 billion cubic meter of RUE gas.

The decision on return was made by the Stockholm arbitration court where RUE addressed with the claim to "Naftogaz". In August it has to be approved or protested by arbitration court of Ukraine.

Meanwhile, in SBU yet don't speak, whether will be to call Miller and Golubev on interrogation. In a press - "Gazprom" service comments also refused.

It is known that on June 8 the SBU brought criminal case upon waste by employees of NAK Naftogaz Ukrainy of the transit gas belonging to RUE ("Gazprom" owns 50% of actions, Dmitry Firtash - 45%, Ivan Fursin - 5%).

Makarenko, in particular, accuse of an illegal customs clearance in the spring of 2009 of 11 billion cubic meter of the gas belonging to RUE (h. 2 Art. 367 of UK - "the office negligence which has entailed serious consequences").

His lawyer Sukhoy distributed the statement in which it is reported that "Gazprom" in the person of Golubev was the initiator of a cedation "Gazprom" to "Naftogaz" of the right of the requirement of a debt from RUE and drawing up contracts of purchase and sale of gas.

The lawyer refers to the publication in the Ukrainian press of the text of his letter #06-2188 of October 10, 2008 addressed to the first deputy head of board of NAK Igor Didenko.

-


Комментариев: {{total}}


englishcriminality