The supreme administrative court of Ukraine refused opening of business on the claim to ex-to the president Victor Yushchenko about his intervention in gas negotiations in 2008 and the edition of illegal directives to the government and HAK «Naftogaz of Ukraine».
About it reports «Mirror of week».
According to information published in the Unified state register of judgments, I decided to leave the resolution VASU this business without consideration.
As the claimant - the lawyer Stanislav Batrin explained, court, refusing business opening, referred to that the claimant passed six-months circulation period in court which the court calculates since the moment when it became known of Yushchenko's actions.
According to the lawyer, refusal in business opening against Yushchenko testifies about «selective justice» - after all earlier админсуды, not in view of terms, considered the claim to Yushchenko and recognized illegal his decree about assignment to Roman Shukhevich ranks Hera of Ukraine of October 12, 2007.
Then it was based on need of adoption of the right judgment decision and research of all circumstances on business, ensuring justice.
- In this case, in a similar legal situation, the court refused to guarantee justice for one reason: there are direct proofs of intervention of Yushchenko in gas negotiations, there are Yushchenko's written directives, and the court couldn't ignore it and would have to establish the facts of illegal actions ex-the president, to interrogate Oleg Dubinu and Yulia Timoshenko, - from the lawyer marked.
- Today we can draw conclusions about selective justice in Ukraine. Other conclusion will be pertinent also: Victor Yushchenko isn't the ordinary citizen of Ukraine, - Batrin summarized.
We will remind, earlier Kiev lawyer Stanislav Batrin I gave on ex-the president Victor Yushchenko the claim in court for a capture on itself competences of Cabinet of Ministers and Ministry of Fuel and Energy in 2008.