The State Office of Public Prosecutor made by the respondent in the case of Zhvaniya

Online: {{ reading || 0 }}Read:{{ views || 776 }}Comments:{{ comments || 0 }}    Rating:(465)         

The Pechersky regional court of Kiev considering the claim about honor and dignity protection of the deputy David Zhvaniya to the deputy the head of the secretariat of the president to Igor Pukshin, decided to attract as the codefendant on this case the State Office of Public Prosecutor.

Such decision was made at court session on Thursday, April 9, the newspaper "writesThe businessman - Ukraine".

This meeting began with giving by Zhvaniya's representatives of the statement for increase in claim requirements.

On last court session as the witness the prosecutor - the criminalist of the State Office of Public Prosecutor Alexey Donskoy was interrogated. Representatives of the deputy, referring to that during him the new facts were established, asked court to attract GPU as the codefendant and to oblige department to disprove published information, namely - Donskoy's statement for Zhvaniya's possible participation in poisoning of the candidate for president Victor Yushchenko, made it on July 23, 2008.

"My experience of the investigator allows to allow two options: or he is (Zhvaniya) something or of someone is afraid in connection with investigation of this business, or he is involved in a crime", - the investigator declared then.

After that Pukshin declared that Zhvaniya "directly or indirectly helped the candidate for president to have supper poison" as was one of main organizers of a dinner on whom Yushchenko was allegedly poisoned.

"He (Donskoy) reported (in court) that the statement made by it was identical to Igor Pukshin's statement, respectively, information distributed by Pukshin, was received from an official source", - the representative of the deputy Oksana Dytynko reasoned the position at court session on April 9.

The representative of the deputy head of the secretariat of the president Alexander Bilous objected: "The claimant at the same time change both a subject, and the bases for the claim, and the Code of civil procedure it isn't authorized. But the claimant can address with the separate claim to the State Office of Public Prosecutor or Donskoy".

Having listened to both, the judge satisfied the petition of the representative of the deputy and made the decision to attract the State Office of Public Prosecutor as the codefendant.

According to a judgment Donskoy, being the primary source of information on Zhvaniya's possible participation in Yushchenko's poisoning, it is also involved in matter in quality of the third party.

Besides increase in claim requirements, during a court session the representative of the deputy declared intention to claim regulations of GPU approved by the order of the public prosecutor in which, among other things, the order of distribution of office information is stated through the court. According to Dytynko, it is known of him from mass media, "but in broad access he isn't present therefore we can't provide it independently".


Комментариев: {{total}}