"Crime. Is NOT PRESENT" wrote about the conflict which inflamed between heads of JSC Kontakt-Zhilbud Victor and Anatoly Chaykami and the head of JSC NPTs ARI
We will remind, the conflict situation arose round the land plot located in the city of Nikolaev on Potemkinskaya St., 84.
We will remind that last week the position on the matter was explained by heads of JSC Kontakt-Zhilbud, and yesterday, to tell the Nikolaev journalists about that that occurs, Igor Rybachenko decided also.
He told that else in 1997 of JSC NPTs ARI redeemed three apartments in угловоме to Potemkinskaya St. address, 84 and убустроило there office. Then, in 2002 of JSC NPTs ARI signs the contract with the Executive Committee of the City Soviet of People's Deputies on rent of the land plot for 10 years of 550 sq.m.
"In 2005 here появлась JSC Kontakt-Zhilbud. They bought one of apartments in other structure and decided to build the 5-floor house on this place. Here then all also began", - I. Rybachenko told.
The director of JSC NPTs ARI claims that from the very beginning everything wasn't correct.
According to him, 15.09.2005. The Nikolaev city council makes the decision No. 36/33 on allocation of the land plot on Potemkinskaya St., 84 JSC Kontakt-Zhilbud for restoration and further service of the destroyed structure. This decision of city council was challenged in Economic court and 03.04.2007 the court recognized illegal the decision of the City Council No. 36/33 on allocation of the land plot on Potemkinskaya St., 84 JSC Kontakt-Zhilbud.
"About it know in the Executive Committee of the City Soviet of People's Deputies and in the City Council, but this decision still isn't cancelled and it is used in the purposes by our opponents. For example, on the basis of this decision the lease contract between the Executive Committee of the City Soviet of People's Deputies and JSC Kontakt-Zhilbud was signed. That turns out, nonexistent apartments "see" in the Executive Committee of the City Soviet of People's Deputies, the City Council and even BTI whereas they aren't present actually", - I. Rybachenko was indignant.
After that the director of "ARI" and the lawyer of JSC Kontakt-Zhilbud Mikhail Lutsky "showed" each other decisions of the courts which, allegedly proved case of each of the parties, but contradicted each other.At the representative of JSC Kontakt-Zhilbud of these decisions it was whole 8, and at I. Rybachenko - only 1. It should be noted, as that and other party ут